Tag Archive for 'Rodecap'

New Spambot In Town Using Compromised Websites To Send Spam

Today, while digging in my sandnet, I came across a trojan that I’ve never seen before and that appeared to be new to me. The trojan gained my attention because its HTTP POSTing to www.google.com which is a bit weird (but more on this later). So, I decided to have a closer look at the trojan and found 20 binaries in my sandnet that showed up a similar behaviour:

2013-07-21 a1ae35eadf7599d2f661a9ca7f0f2150
2013-07-23 a00fd847d7152d2439251d5e5bf20dca
2013-07-29 a11daf09c9ef63466637a0c97a44ae0e
2013-07-30 289e7c3dd1771a1e0865417f81e2308c
2013-07-30 2f1da170625f1f5e5e9aebf0627abd62
2013-07-30 39e5cad818c033dd4b417593a2c16474
2013-07-30 3acf24d2285ce24f54ea60d33005ac2e
2013-07-30 4dce9885245756c8b159c08ebb660040
2013-07-30 4f5794df9bb22321975bc028038d6194
2013-07-30 6daf4f7a6f7131373ff16e7604555cc3
2013-07-30 75d4f090f80ef2628f659cad707d4b7d
2013-07-30 922260a5adbf1698cf1ab0eb0d40036a
2013-07-30 94bda5fa7c52c24259cdf2b3f7c14ebf
2013-07-30 a4b05e98cf2778fd5f44d5c3f5ff0599
2013-07-31 ab11d73f0de74b48deb7023483b49979
2013-07-31 b36c12525968dd29f23523d8898c4c82
2013-07-31 e9db3ab0f75f339995aecd61ebeb8cb6
2013-07-31 f5b627d158d61034064e71cfdd3eaa41
2013-08-01 47f910f5caf4a886675bdb88a317b9c2
2013-08-01 a29fd30396c564fc40a86b54ec36d602

As shown above, I’ve seen the first malware binary showing this behaviour on 2013-07-21. The trojan seems to be, at least from my perspective, somewhat new. What also made me curious of about this trojan is the fact that only 3 out of these 20 binaries are known to Virustotal. However, they seem to have quite a good AV coverage:

MD5 hash: a1ae35eadf7599d2f661a9ca7f0f2150
AV coverage: 35 / 46

MD5 hash: a00fd847d7152d2439251d5e5bf20dca
AV coverage: 34 / 46

MD5 hash: a1ae35eadf7599d2f661a9ca7f0f2150
AV coverage: 35 / 46

Having a look at the AV-results, this trojan is being detected as Rodecap by most AV-vendors. Symantec discovered this new threat on July 23 2013, two days after my sandnet came across the first malware binary showing with this behaviour:

*** The Trojan ****
Once a computer has been infected, Rodecap installs itself into the following directories:

C:\Document and Settings\USERNAME\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\
C:\Document and Settings\USERNAME\Local Settings\Application Data\

The trojan copies itself to these directories using one of the following filenames:


In addition, Rodecap might also write the following files:

C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\ieudinit.exe
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\dllhost.exe

To ensure that Rodecap gets loaded on the system start, it creates a registry key in HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\ using one of the following names:

HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\Microsoft Connection Manager

The AV-vendor ESET has documented additional filenames and registry keys used by Rodecap.

*** Rodecap C&C Traffic ***
The botnet C&C communication used by Rodecap is quite fancy. As mentioned before in this blog post, Rodecap initially communicates with a C&C server using www.google.com. But it also does some other interesting C&C communication which is described below.

To obtain the address of the main C&C server, Rodecap gets the MX record of lyrics-db.org. This DNS response contains two MX records which are pointing to a different domain name:

DNS query: lyrics-db.org IN MX

DNS response:
13 mx1.games-olympic.org.
17 mx2.games-olympic.org.

Rodecap will now obtain the IP address of the main C&C server by getting the A record of one of the referenced MX records:

DNS Query: mx1.games-olympic.org IN A
DNS response:

Rodecap C&C Traffic

Rodecap C&C traffic (DNS)

This will tell Rodecap to use the IP address as C&C server. Rodecap even goes one step further, and tries to evade sandboxes by using www.google.com in the HTTP Host header while talking to the C&C (of course this won’t work in a corporate environment where a web proxy server is in place):

POST /protocol.php?p=XXX&d=XXX HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Host: www.google.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
Content-Length: 72
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cache-Control: no-cache


HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 X
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=20

*encrypted data*

If you take a look at this HTTP Header this request should go to www.google.com, but in fact the bot sends the request to which has been previously obtained by Rodecap using the MX DNS query. The IP address belongs to a Russian web hosting company called Digital Networks CJSC (DINET / msm.ru):

inetnum: –
netname: RU-DINET-20081230
descr: Digital Networks CJSC
admin-c: DNO-RIPE
tech-c: DNO-RIPE
country: RU
mnt-lower: DN-MNT
mnt-routes: DN-MNT
mnt-domains: DN-MNT
source: RIPE # Filtered

Of course, Google is not hosted in Russia…

Once the bot contacted the main C&C server, it will tell the bot to drop additional malware components (PE32 executables):


Again, these files are not hosted on Google, but on The dropped files are not .jpg files rather than windows executables:

Rodecap Binary Drop

Rodcap dropping additional binaris

*** Rodecap spam module ***
What Rodecap drops here seems to be at least one module that is used for spamming. This spam module has an interesting way of spamming internet users mailboxes. To do so, Rodecap will call a C&C server at newsleter.org to get a task from the botnet herder using HTTP GET:

GET /d/t14.php HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: -
Host: t.newsleter.org
Cache-Control: no-cache

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 X
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 309
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5
Last-Modified: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 X
ETag: “X”
Accept-Ranges: bytes

*encrypted data*

I’ve seen the spam module using different subdomains of newsleter.org, and they are hosted on different IP addresses:

t.newsleter.org ( – AS12695 DINET RU)
bt.newsleter.org ( – AS23033 Wowrack US)
seek.newsleter.org ( – AS23033 Wowrack US)
fw.newsleter.org ( – AS56534 Prix RU)

What Rodecap will try to get from these C&Cs is a spam template and a list of hijacked websites (more on that below).

*** CMS php backdoor component ***
Unlike other spam botnets that are either using stolen SMTP credentials for spamming, spamming the victims mailserver directly or abusing open SMTP relays, Rodecap seems to use a huge list of websites that have been compromised and running some kind of PHP script (backdoor). Within a few hours I was able to retrieve more than 3’500 unique websites that seems to run an outdated content management system (CMS, such as Joomla!) and which have already been compromised and hosting a malicious PHP file. A list of compromised websites I’ve came across so far and that are associated with Rodecap can be found here:


Unfortunately I wasn’t able to get a copy of such a PHP file yet, but based on the botnet traffic towards these compromised websites it seems that Rodecap is spamming through these PHP files:

Rodecap Spammodule C&C Traffic

Roadcap C&C Traffic

The HTTP POST request look like this:

POST /old/nieuw/plugins/editors/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/devkit/stats.php HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
Host: www.hrmet.nl
Content-Length: 883
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cache-Control: no-cache

encrypted data

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 X
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.2.14
Content-Length: 39
Keep-Alive: timeout=1, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: text/html


If the PHP backdoor response with “OK” and the task ID, the spam email was obviously sent successfully. I’ve also seen various compromised websites returning the OS version and the task id instead of just “OK”. For example:

Linux20+taskid+1 (for webservers running Linux)
WINNT20+taskid+1 (for webservers running Windows, mostly IIS)

If the PHP backdoor isn’t able to send the spam mail (eg. because the spam mail has been rejected by the remote mail server), the PHP backdoor will send this information back to the bot along with the error message from the remove mail server.

Some examples:

Linux20+taskid+4+(dave332453@aol.com)+550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: aol.com|
Linux20+taskid+3+(davehibbeler@hotmail.com)+421 RP-001 (BAY0-MC2-F47) Unfortunately, some messages from weren’t sent. Please try again. We have limits for how many messages can be sent per hour and per day. You can also refer to http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors.|
Linux20+taskid+2+(davecarter159@yahoo.com)+421 4.7.0 [GL01] Message from ( temporarily deferred – 4.16.50. Please refer to http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-21.html|

According to the error messages, Rodecap currently targets big free email providers such as Windows Live, Yahoo and AOL.

I ran a Rodecap binary in a sandbox for a few minutes and checked the responses from the compromised websites. Based on the responses it appears that most of the spam sent by Rodecap were accepted by the remote mail servers.

*** Conclusion ***
This new threat seems to be just another spam bot in the wild. However, it is using some interesting methods for C&C communication and for sending out spam that I’ve never seen before. In fact the idea is quite good: There are ten thousands of websites out there running vulnerable (unpatched) CMSes that can easily be exploited to install malicious software on the victims webspace. The Rodecap gang seizes this opportunity to install a PHP backdoor that then allows them to send emails through the compromised webservers. By doing this, the criminals avoid common blacklists, especially blacklists that are listing dynamic IP space used by end users (DSL / cable subscribers) such as Spamhaus PBL or SORBS DUL.

To defend your network against this new threat, you should:

  • Block HTTP User-Agent “Mozilla/5.0″ and “-” on your Web Proxy
  • Ensure that your CMS is up to date running the latest version

In addition, you might also want to block the C&C communication associated with Rodecap going to the following destinations:


UPDATE 2013-08-02 11:15 UTC
A reader of abuse.ch contacted me and suggested to block
entirely which belongs to Digital Network JSC (DI-NET Russia). According to him this blockage didn’t cause any false positive in the last 2 years.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/abuse_ch